{"id":1151,"date":"2026-01-24T08:55:20","date_gmt":"2026-01-24T08:55:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/peaceful-mccarthy.213-158-90-25.plesk.page\/index.php\/2026\/01\/24\/the-use-of-insulin-sensitising-agents-in-ovulation-induction-in-women-with-polycystic-ovary-syndrome\/"},"modified":"2026-08-12T09:04:07","modified_gmt":"2026-08-12T09:04:07","slug":"the-use-of-insulin-sensitising-agents-in-ovulation-induction-in-women-with-polycystic-ovary-syndrome","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/peaceful-mccarthy.213-158-90-25.plesk.page\/index.php\/2026\/01\/24\/the-use-of-insulin-sensitising-agents-in-ovulation-induction-in-women-with-polycystic-ovary-syndrome\/","title":{"rendered":"The use of insulin sensitising agents in ovulation induction in women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: right;\">HORMONES 2006, 5(3):171-178<br \/>\nDOI: 10.14310\/horm.2002.11181<\/p>\n<div class=\"article-authors\"><strong>Richard Fleming<\/strong><\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div class=\"article-institutes\">University of Glasgow and Division of Developmental Medicine, both based at Glasgow Royal Infirmary, G31 2ER, GB<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div class=\"article-pdf\" style=\"text-align: right;\"><a class=\"pdf-download\" href=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/pdf\/The%20use%20of%20insulin%20sensitising%20agents.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Download PDF<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"article-abstract\">\n<hr \/>\n<p><strong>Address correspondence and requests for reprints to:<\/strong><br \/>\nProf. Richard Fleming, Univ. Dept. Obstet. Gynaecol., Level 3, QEB, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G31 2ER, Scotland, UK,\u00a0\u00a0Phone: +44 (0)141 211 4707, Fax: +44 (0)141 552 0873, e-mail: <a href=\"mailto:r.fleming@udcf.gla.ac.uk\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">r.fleming@udcf.gla.ac.uk<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Received 19-06-06, Revised 04-07-06, Accepted 07-07-06<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><strong>Abstract<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Insulin resistance is an important &#8220;upstream&#8221; driver for reproductive and metabolic abnormalities in women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS). This theoretical background is now supported by substantial evidence for treating women with PCOS with insulin sensitising agents such as metformin or the thiazolidinediones. Although the available data are based upon studies comprised of relatively small numbers of patients, powerful evidence of potential benefit is emerging. Data from controlled studies, which are usually short-term and of limited magnitude, indicate modest effects of insulin sensitizers on ovulation when applied as the only drug. However, potentially important benefits are achieved when such treatment is combined with other methods. These benefits include both increased fertility and decreased risks for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Furthermore, there may also be benefits in terms of alleviation of pregnancy complications. The available evidence supports consideration of the use of metformin from the earliest stages of treatment in women with PCOS.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Key words:<\/strong> Insulin sensitising agents, Insulin sensitivity, Metformin, Ovulation, PCOS<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"article-content\">\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><strong>INTRODUCTION<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p>Patients with PCOS present at clinics complain\u00ading of infertility, menstrual disturbances or hirsut\u00adism, with or without acne, and are therefore seen by gynaecologists, primary care physicians, endocrinol\u00adogists and dermatologists. Correspondingly, there appear to be substantial variations in the features of the disorder, depending upon the background of<br \/>\nthe patients studied, including primary complaint, ethnic origins and degree of obesity. It is notewor\u00adthy that, although it has been accepted for some years that abnormal insulin metabolism is a major feature of PCOS, no aspect of it is included in the most recent consensus definition [Rotterdam Con\u00adsensus, 2005].<sup>1<\/sup> It is therefore even more surprising that one of the most common therapeutic approach\u00ades is via oral antihyperglycaemic medication in the form of metformin. Metformin is used in women with PCOS for many indications: infertility, preg\u00adnancy outcome, hirsutism or cycle regulation, as well as for long-term prevention of undiagnosed and the\u00adoretical morbidities. In none of these indications is metformin licensed, and the prospect of any change in this situation is remote.<\/p>\n<p>This review will discuss the role of insulin resis\u00adtance in PCOS and the real and potential role of insulin sensitizers (particularly metformin) in pro\u00admoting fertility. The evidence base addressing many of these important themes, though not extensive is growing, and several interesting issues are emerg\u00ading.<br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><strong><br \/>\nINSULIN RESISTANCE IN PCOS AND ITS ROLES<br \/>\n<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\nThe link between perturbed insulin action and PCOS was first highlighted in 1980<sup>2<\/sup> and, though pe\u00adripheral insulin resistance is most evident in obese patients, it has been proposed that obesity and PCOS have separate and synergistic relationships with in\u00adsulin resistance.<sup>3<\/sup> In reality, lean women with PCOS rarely demonstrate frank insulin resistance, although they do show insulin hypersecretion.<sup>4,5<\/sup><\/p>\n<p>The mechanism(s) underlying insulin resistance and reproductive abnormalities in women with PCOS are unclear. There are several factors poten\u00adtially implicated including:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Genetic contributions to both reproductive and metabolic features, with the possibility that the same genetic factor(s) are simultaneously re\u00adsponsible for both;<sup>3<\/sup><\/li>\n<li>Defects in adipose tissue lipolytic cascades;<sup>6<\/sup><\/li>\n<li>Inflammation mediators leading to insulin resis\u00adtance;<sup>7<\/sup><\/li>\n<li>Fetal programming effects;<sup>8,9<\/sup><\/li>\n<li>Primary ovarian hypersensitivity to insulin, and\/ or androgens, at least in some functional aspects, leading firstly to altered hormonal milieu and over time to alterations in body fat distribution (central &gt; peripheral) with positive feedback towards greater insulin resistance.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Research to clarify potential mechanisms in gen\u00aderal requires larger studies than those published so far. The heterogeneity of PCOS also allows the possibility that differing factors underlie the vari\u00adous phenotypes in PCOS women. Furthermore, dif\u00adferences in ethnicity combined with disparities in environmental and clinical perspectives (gynaecol\u00adogists \/ endocrinologists \/ vascular biologists) across the world render it a phenomenon whose comple\u00adxity will take much effort to resolve.<\/p>\n<p>Despite insulin resistance in adipose tissue and skeletal muscle, the ovary (and adrenals) may re\u00admain relatively sensitive to insulin for at least some of insulin&#8217;s actions, and both insulin and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) have stimulatory effects enhancing thecal and stromal androgen production within the ovary. Androgens are carried in the cir\u00adculation bound to sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) with high affinity. Thus, clinical manifes\u00adtations of androgen activity (hirsutism, acne and alopecia) depend upon the SHBG activity as well as the total circulating androgen concentrations, and insulin resistance (and\/or hyperandrogenism) is as\u00adsociated with reduced circulating SHBG.<sup>10<\/sup><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><strong>INFLAMMATION<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p>Inflammation is intimately linked to insulin re\u00adsistance and its role as a causal factor in the athero\u00adgenic process is currently a major topic. Surrogate markers of inflammation, such as C-Reactive Pro\u00adtein (CRP), predict the risk of Coronary Heart Dis\u00adease (CHD) events in both men and women, inde\u00adpendently of classical risk factors. Women with PCOS have been shown to have increased concen\u00adtrations of circulating CRP,<sup>11,12<\/sup> possibly independent of Body Mass Index (BMI). Thus, low-grade chron\u00adic inflammation might be another mechanism con\u00adtributing to increased risk of CHD and type 2 dia\u00adbetes in women with PCOS. However, it is equally possible that these factors may also contribute to subfertility in women with PCOS, since vascularisa\u00adtion is a critical component in both follicular devel\u00adopment and implantation. There is evidence, cited below, suggesting that oocytes subject to &#8216;inflamma\u00adtory stress&#8217; may demonstrate sub-optimal develop\u00admental potential.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><strong>THE OVARY AND FERTILITY<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p>Fertility abnormalities in PCOS are mostly due to reduced ovulation frequency, possibly secondary to the fundamental observation of an increased den\u00adsity of primary follicles in relation to the primordial follicle pool.<sup>13-15<\/sup> After a long growth phase to antral stage, an excess of small follicles leads to a reduced incidence of follicular maturation and ovulation as well as to definitive and diagnostic hyperandroge\u00adnaemia.<sup>16<\/sup><\/p>\n<p>It should always be borne in mind that ovarian follicles, when allowed or induced to undergo mat\u00aduration, do not appear to be compromised in wom\u00aden with PCOS, as high fecundity rates can be achieved in this patient group by simple stimulation with low doses of exogenous Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH).<sup>17<\/sup> Furthermore, this may occur without modification of body mass or other factors related to hyperinsulinaemia.<\/p>\n<p>In addition to the ovarian sequelae, there is also a possible increase in the incidence of early preg\u00adnancy loss and an increased frequency of pregnancy complications. These are diverse phenomena which are not clearly related except by an unidentified con\u00adcept linking energy metabolism, follicular growth factors, steroid metabolism and developmental fac\u00adtors. The incidence and degrees of all these phe\u00adnomena appear to be promoted by obesity, which may be independent of insulin resistance <em>per se<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><strong>MEANS OF REDUCING INSULIN RESISTANCE IN WOMEN WITH PCOS <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p>Classical approaches to reducing insulin resis\u00adtance and its effects are generally applied in cohorts of older individuals rather than in infertile woman with PCOS. There is no study examining effects of lifestyle or insulin sensitizing agents on the incidence of diabetes or CHD in women with PCOS. The evi\u00addence base is also sparse concerning the effects of intervention on surrogate vascular end-points, such as endothelial function measures or carotid Maxi\u00admum Intimal Thickness (MIT).<\/p>\n<p>There are now many short-term (and generally small) studies on changes in insulin measures and related reproductive hormonal changes, in particu\u00adlar with metformin. Since the detailed measures of ovulation frequency remain under-reported and few robust studies have addressed changes in CHD risk factors with interventions, further data are required. There are also studies using the potentially more potent thiazolidinediones in women with PCOS, but they are few, and these products have intrinsic the\u00adoretical risks in women wishing to conceive, as they are designated category C risk in pregnancy, due to evidence of retarded fetal development in rats.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><em><strong>Lifestyle modification<\/strong><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p>Good evidence exists demonstrating substantial metabolic and reproductive benefits attainable by lifestyle improvements in PCOS, as in the general population. In women with PCOS, a reduction in BMI of around 5-10% by dint of dietary therapy leads to improvements in ovarian function and some metabolic risk factors.<sup>18,19<\/sup> The most exciting evidence in support of lifestyle modification derives from a non-PCOS population showing that intensive inter\u00advention incorporating a 7% weight loss and at least 150 minutes of physical activity per week can sub\u00adstantially reduce (by 58%) the development of dia\u00adbetes in subjects at risk.<sup>20<\/sup> This work should promote more vigorous dietary and exercise intervention studies in women with PCOS. It could be mentioned that due to their greater accumulation of risk fac\u00adtors for similar weight gain, women with PCOS will reap greater benefits from increasing physical ac\u00adtivity levels than their non-PCOS counterparts.<\/p>\n<p>Critically, since many women with PCOS wish to improve fertility, lifestyle measures will be phys\u00adiologically far better for subsequent pregnancy out\u00adcomes than approaches requiring medication alone.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><strong>METFORMIN: OVARIAN FUNCTION AND METABOLISM<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p>Metformin, the oral biguanide antihyperglycae\u00admic drug used for many years in Europe, is now also extensively employed worldwide in both PCOS and type 2 diabetes. It has primary effects on increasing peripheral glucose uptake in response to insulin, with some reduction in basal hepatic glucose pro\u00adduction. It also lowers adipose tissue lipolysis and improves insulin sensitivity in muscle. It does not provoke hypoglycaemia and is now first line thera\u00adpy in overweight patients with diabetes.<\/p>\n<p>The first placebo controlled randomised study on the use of metformin treatment alone in women with PCOS<sup>21<\/sup> showed both a shorter delay between initiation of treatment and the first ovulation as well as a higher ovulation rate during the 4 months of treatment, compared with the placebo treated group. However, only 1\/3 of the patients treated achieved normal menstrual rhythm, indicating that the ovari\u00adan elements were not completely resolved by this treatment. It also showed that the high levels of cir\u00adculating Luteinizing Hormone (LH) remained ele\u00advated in those patients not achieving normal men\u00adstrual rhythm and normalized only in those under\u00adgoing ovulation on a regular basis. This observation suggests that abnormal LH secretion is a product of anovulation rather than a causative element of the ovarian disorder.<\/p>\n<p>The ovulation rate summaries for placebo and metformin arms from the major reviews are shown in <a href=\"\/links\/The%20use%20of%20insulin%20_tab1.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Table 1<\/a> . One important point to recognise in all these studies is the short-term nature of the obser\u00advation period. Insulin is known to promote the ac\u00adtions of LH leading to increased androgen produc\u00adtion from ovarian tissue, and metformin treatment leads to a rapid, if modest, reduction in circulating androgen concentrations in most studies.<\/p>\n<p>It was noted above that one of the prime fea\u00adtures of PCOS is abnormal primordial-to-primary follicle development, and so far little attention has been paid to these events with any clinical interven\u00adtion in PCOS. However, there is evidence from two studies of protracted metformin treatment,<sup>22,23<\/sup> sug\u00adgesting that the number of follicles recruited to grow at this earliest stage may indeed be attenuated by such treatment, which may be related to reduced insulin and\/or androgen drive at the earliest stages of development. This in turn suggests that in order to explore a role for metformin in correcting the over-production of follicles by women with PCOS, the investigations should start only after 6 months treatment or more, not during the first 6 months.<\/p>\n<p><em><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><strong>Ovulation rates and patients who benefit most<br \/>\n<\/strong><\/span><\/em><br \/>\nRestricted to short-term observations as we are, the first three reviews<sup>24-26<\/sup> suggest that metformin doubles ovulation rates from low basal levels. On average, one additional ovulation is attained every 5 months with metformin treatment, which is a mod\u00adest benefit in a clinical setting, while it has rarely been shown to increase pregnancy rates.<\/p>\n<p>One recent randomised study demonstrated that metformin treatment conferred no benefit over and above that of lifestyle modification.<sup>27<\/sup> However, more encouraging results, in a relatively lean cohort, were obtained by comparison with the effect of laparo\u00adscopic ovarian diathermy, showing that metformin was at least as effective in terms of achieving preg\u00adnancy within 6 months.<sup>28<\/sup><\/p>\n<p>Sub-group analysis<sup>21<\/sup> and direct investigation<sup>29<\/sup> indicate that metformin may be more effective in lean women, with least metabolic disturbance, sug\u00adgesting that the therapy is insufficient to correct the metabolic disturbance induced by obesity in the short-term, at least at current doses. This observa\u00adtion supports the hypothesis that obesity and insu\u00adlin resistance may have independent roles in PCOS.<sup>3<\/sup><\/p>\n<p><em><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><strong>Metformin as first line fertility treatment?<br \/>\n<\/strong><\/span><\/em><br \/>\nIn standard fertility treatment, metformin has been shown to increase the response rate to clomi\u00adphene citrate (the erstwhile first line therapy), lead\u00ading to an increased pregnancy rate in this first line approach.<sup>30<\/sup> However, a recent large prospective ran\u00addomised, multicentre trial in Holland31 comparing clomiphene citrate alone or combined with metform\u00adin, has produced strong evidence contradicting the original observations.<sup>30<\/sup> It may be anticipated that this will lead to a re-consideration of the general practice, and possible explorations of sub-groups in which the combined therapy may be deemed bene\u00adficial.<\/p>\n<p>As metformin alone may lead to spontaneous ovulation, particularly in the leaner patient with PCOS, and given that any pregnancy is more likely to be a singleton (in contrast to clomiphene citrate, where we can expect a &gt;10% twinning rate), there is a valid case supporting the use of metformin as first line therapy in women with PCOS. There is no direct evidence to corroborate this concept, but it should be tested prospectively.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><strong>METFORMIN IN ASSISTED CONCEPTION (IVF\/ICSI)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p>Standard assisted conception treatment involves stimulation of multiple follicular development with exogenous gonadotrophins, and because metform\u00adin appears to improve some aspects of follicular growth, its potential role has been explored in some interesting trials. Though many of the trials lack acceptable levels of control, useful evidence is emerging.<\/p>\n<p>The main observations in two randomised con\u00adtrol studies<sup>32,33<\/sup> indicate that relatively short-term metformin treatment does not influence total folli\u00adcular responses to exogenous FSH, evidenced by numbers of follicles, duration and dose of FSH and numbers of oocytes. This is an important observa\u00adtion, leading us to conclude that short-term modu\u00adlation of the insulin and androgen environment does not affect either the stockpile of follicles awaiting FSH stimulation or the sensitivity of those individu\u00adal follicles to FSH stimulation in terms of growth rate and amount of FSH required to achieve matu\u00adration.<\/p>\n<p>However, two end-points deserve further explo\u00adration. The Norwegian group<sup>32<\/sup> observed that the lean sub-group showed a statistically increased preg\u00adnancy rate, and the study by Tang et al,<sup>33<\/sup> which in\u00adcluded relatively lean patients in the whole study group, showed an unambiguous improvement in pregnancy rate. A large multi-centre study is now addressing this issue and we await the outcome with some anticipation.<\/p>\n<p>It would appear that the mechanism for any ben\u00adeficial effect is unrelated to changes in FSH sensi\u00adtivity and gross ovarian responses, as these were not influenced by metformin treatment in either study. One potential mechanism of benefit was proposed by Richardson et al,<sup>34<\/sup> who showed that the granu\u00adlosa cells, which normally provide the oocyte with essential pyruvate, amino acids and growth factors, displayed altered metabolism in women with PCOS. The altered metabolism displayed reduced break\u00addown of glucose to pyruvate and increased lipolysis, as in other tissues in the insulin resistant state. Con\u00adsequently, the oocyte is exposed to reduced pyru\u00advate (its main source of energy) and increased reac\u00adtive oxygen species and inflammatory products, po\u00adtentially reducing oocyte viability.<\/p>\n<p>A second and possibly equally important obser\u00advation is the clear benefit that metformin treatment affords in terms of ovarian hyperstimulation syn\u00addrome (OHSS). This observation is supported by another randomised trial.<sup>35<\/sup> Hence there is good clin\u00adical reason to use the drug in these circumstances, because women with PCOS are at increased risk of OHSS, which can be a serious side effect of IVF treatment. This is such a dramatic observation that it may also be instructive of the underlying ovarian abnormality in PCOS, and the role of insulin me\u00adtabolism in vascular development of the ovary and follicles.<\/p>\n<p><em><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><strong>Metformin in pregnancy<\/strong><\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p>Large observational studies<sup>36<\/sup> have suggested that metformin may confer a number of protective ad\u00advantages through pregnancy in women with PCOS by reducing complications such as gestational dia\u00adbetes and even early pregnancy loss. This effect was explored prospectively in a randomised program\u00adme<sup>37<\/sup> in which secondary end-point evaluations of late pregnancy problems were abundant in the pla\u00adcebo arm and virtually absent from the metformin arm. Since it has been shown that metformin cross\u00ades the placenta,<sup>38<\/sup> care must be exercised to avoid indiscriminate use and any benefits should be ex\u00adplored in a research environment.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><em><strong>Metformin in PCOS: weight loss<\/strong><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p>The high incidence of obesity amongst women with PCOS is an important consideration in man\u00adagement and approaches to treatment. The thiazo\u00adlidinediones tend to increase weight by dint of their mode of action, which is a further argument militat\u00ading against their use in potentially fertile women with PCOS. On the other hand, metformin is generally associated with weight reduction. In terms of meta\u00adbolic and anthropometric effects, current evidence supports a reduction in BMI by around 4% over a few months compared to placebo (representing ~2-\u00ad3 kg reduction) in women with PCOS.<sup>39<\/sup> In addition, a role for different doses of metformin has been minimally explored, and where it has been, perhaps more consistent effects upon weight loss can be de\u00adtermined with a higher dose schedule.<sup>39<\/sup><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><strong>SUMMARY<br \/>\n<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\nBy and large, these studies suggest that women with PCOS in the fertility clinic may derive benefit and improved safety from treatment with metform\u00adin at all stages. Whilst it is critically important that these studies be confirmed in more extensive trials, it is also important to establish the mechanisms by which the drug confers these benefits. There may be an underlying issue of energy metabolism, but the connections with a number of the observations are tenuous and, in reproductive terms, the link with androgen metabolism may prove to be the critical element.<\/p>\n<p>Overall, the metabolic and reproductive chang\u00ades noted with metformin use in women with PCOS are consistent with its known effect in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, the effects are generally modest and larger trials of longer duration and more comprehensive controls are required.<\/p>\n<p>It is important to note that metformin is not li\u00adcensed for any of these indications in PCOS and, as shown in the evidence presented above, it is cer\u00adtainly not a &#8216;cure&#8217; for all reproductive and metabol\u00adic derangements in women with PCOS. Despite this, once established on metformin treatment, women with a history of PCOS are reluctant to discontinue treatment.<sup>40<\/sup><\/p>\n<p>In view of metformin&#8217;s generally modest bene\u00adfits in women with PCOS, the relative merits of metformin combined with lifestyle changes, in par\u00adticular exercise, very definitely warrant further ex\u00adamination, and such studies are being developed. It is interesting that both exercise and metformin up-regulate AMP-activated protein kinase activity, a metabolic switch regulating efficient glucose and fatty acid metabolism. It should also be noted that lifestyle intervention was more successful than met\u00adformin alone in reducing risk of diabetes, once again emphasizing the critical role for lifestyle interven\u00adtion.<\/p>\n<p><em><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><strong>Future research: reproduction in women with PCOS<\/strong><\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p>In the fertility arena, there is a need for a coor\u00addinated programme of investigations using multi-centre prospective methods. The influence of obe\u00adsity and metformin dose on ovarian function has yet to be explored to the degree that is needed to fully elucidate effects. As the life history of ovarian folli\u00adcular development is so protracted and PCOS ap\u00adpears to be associated with abnormalities from the very beginning, examinations of the effects of treat\u00adment at this level are required. Other potential ar\u00adeas of benefit, including pregnancy complications, should be examined on a large, multi-centre scale.<\/p>\n<p>There is evidence to support the use of metform\u00adin, in association with other approaches, from the very beginning of treatment of women with PCOS, and this issue should be explored in the research arena.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><strong>CONCLUSION<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p>In the fertility arena, metformin may prove to be of considerable benefit, but mainly in association with other forms of treatment, and the results of recent studies are generally supportive of its extend\u00aded use, perhaps from the very first stages of treat\u00adment.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><strong>REFERENCES<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p>1. The Rotterdam ESHRE\/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS consensus workshop group, 2004 Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod 19: 41-47.<br \/>\n2. Burghen GA, Givens JR, Kitabchi AE, 1980 Correlation of hyperandrogenism with hyperinsulinemia in polycystic ovarian disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 50: 113-116.<br \/>\n3. Dunaif A, Thomas A, 2001 Current concepts in the polycystic ovary syndrome. Annu Rev Med 52: 401-419.<br \/>\n4. Vrbikova J, Cibula D, Dvorakova K, et al, 2004 Insulin sensitivity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89: 2942-2945.<br \/>\n5. Holte J, Bergh T, Berne C, Berglund L, Lithell H, 1994 Enhanced early insulin response to glucose in relation to insulin resistance in women with polycystic ovary syndrome and normal glucose tolerance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 78: 1052-1058.<br \/>\n6. Ek I, Arner P, Ryden M, et al, 2002 A unique defect in the regulation of visceral fat cell lipolysis in the polycystic ovary syndrome as an early link to insulin resistance. Diabetes 5: 484-492.<br \/>\n7. Kelly CC, Lyall H, Petrie JR, et al, 2001 Low grade chronic inflammation in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86: 2453-2455.<br \/>\n8. Abbott DH, Dumesic DA, Franks S, 2002 Developmental origin of polycystic ovary syndrome &#8211; a hypothesis. J Endocrinol 174: 1-5.<br \/>\n9. Cresswell JL, Barker DJ, Osmond C, et al, 1997 Fetal growth, length of gestation, and polycystic ovaries in adult life. Lancet 350: 1131-1135.<br \/>\n10. Nestler JE, 1993 Sex Hormone binding globulin: A marker for hyperinsulinaemia or insulin resistance? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 76: 273-274.<br \/>\n11. Kelly CJ, Lyall H, Petrie JR, et al, 2002 A specific elevation in tissue plasminogen activator antigen in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87: 3287-3290.<br \/>\n12. Morin-Papunen L, Rautio K, Ruokonen A, et al, 2003 Metformin reduces serum C-reactive protein levels in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88: 4649-4654.<br \/>\n13. Hughesdon PE, 1982 Morphology and morphogenesis of the Stein-Leventhal ovary so called .hyperthecosis.. Obstet Gynecol Surv 37: 59-77.<br \/>\n14. Webber LJ, Stubbs S, Stark J, et al, 2003 Formation and early development of follicles in the polycystic ovary. Lancet 362: 1017-1021.<br \/>\n15. Maciel GA, Baracat EC, Benda JA, et al, 2004 Stockpiling of transitional and classic primary follicles in ovaries of women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89: 5321-5327.<br \/>\n16. Jonard S, Dewailly D, 2004 The follicular excess in polycystic ovaries, due to intra-ovarian hyperandrogenism, may be the main culprit for the follicular arrest. Hum Reprod Update 10: 107-117.<br \/>\n17. White DM, Polson DW, Kiddy D, et al, 1996 Induction of ovulation with low dose gonadotrophins in polycystic ovary syndrome: an analysis of 109 pregnancies in 225 women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81: 3821-3824.<br \/>\n18. Kiddy DS, Hamilton-Fairley D, Bush A, et al, 1992 Improvement in endocrine and ovarian function during dietary treatment of obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Clin Endocrinol 36: 105-111.<br \/>\n19. Clark AM, Thornley B, Tomlinson L, et al, 1998 Weight loss in obese infertile women results in improvement in the reproductive outcome for all forms of fertility treatment. Hum Reprod 13: 1502-1505.<br \/>\n20. Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, et al, 2002 Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med 346: 393-403.<br \/>\n21. Fleming R, Hopkinson ZE, Wallace AM, et al, 2002 Ovarian Function and Metabolic Factors in Women with Oligomenorrhea Treated with Metformin in a Randomized Double Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87: 569-574.<br \/>\n22. Fleming R, Harborne L, MacLaughlin DT, et al, 2005 Metformin reduces serum mullerian-inhibiting substance levels in women with polycystic ovary syndrome after protracted treatment. Fertil Steril 83: 130-136.<br \/>\n23. Piltonen T, Morin-Papunen L, Koivunen R, Perheentupa A, Ruokonen A, Tapanainen JS, 2005 Serum anti-Mullerian hormone levels remain high until late reproductive age and decrease during metformin therapy in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod 20: 1820-1826.<br \/>\n24. Harborne L, Fleming R, Lyall H, et al, 2003 Descriptive review of the evidence for the use of metformin in polycystic ovary syndrome. Lancet 361: 1894-1901.<br \/>\n25. Lord JM, Flight IH, Norman RJ, 2003 Metformin in polycystic ovary syndrome: systematic review and metaanalysis. BMJ 327: 951-953.<br \/>\n26. Costello MF, Eden JA, 2003 A systematic review of the reproductive system effects of metformin in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 79: 1-13.<br \/>\n27. Tang T, Glanville J, Hayden CJ, White D, Barth JH, Balen AH, 2006 Combined lifestyle modification and metformin in obese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind multicentre study. Hum Reprod 21: 80-89.<br \/>\n28. Palomba S, Orio Jr, Nardo LG, et al, 2004 Metformin administration versus laparoscopic ovarian diathermy in clomiphene citrate-resistant women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a prospective parallel randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89: 4801-4809.<br \/>\n29. Maciel GA, Soares Junior JM, Alves da Motta EL, Abi Haidar M, de Lima GR, Baracat EC, 2004 Nonobese women with polycystic ovary syndrome respond better than obese women to treatment with metformin. Fer-til Steril 81: 355-360.<br \/>\n30. Nestler JE, Jakubowicz DJ, Evans WS, Pasquali R, 1998 Effects of metformin on spontaneous and clomiphene-induced ovulation in the polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med 338: 1876-1880.<br \/>\n31. Moll E, Bossuyt PM, Korevaar JC, Lambalk CB, van der Veen F, 2006. Effect of clomifene citrate plus metformin and clomifene citrate plus placebo on induction of ovulation in women with newly diagnosed polycystic ovary syndrome: randomised double blind clinical trial. Br Med J 332: 1485.<br \/>\n32. Kjotrod SB, von During V, Carlsen SM, 2004 Metformin treatment before IVF\/ICSI in women with polycystic ovary syndrome; a prospective, randomized, double blind study. Hum Reprod 19: 1315-1322.<br \/>\n33. Tang T, Glanville J, Orsi N, Barth JH, Balen AH, 2006 The use of metformin for women with PCOS undergoing IVF treatment. Hum Reprod 21: 1416-1425.<br \/>\n34. Richardson MC, Cameron IT, Simonis CD, et al, 2005 Insulin and human chorionic gonadotropin cause a shift in the balance of sterol regulatory element-binding protein (SREBP) isoforms toward the SREBP-1c isoform in cultures of human granulosa cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90: 3738-3746.<br \/>\n35. Onalan G, Pabuccu R, Goktolga U, Ceyhan T, Bagis T, Cincik M, 2005 Metformin treatment in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial. Fertil Steril 84: 798-801.<br \/>\n36. Glueck CJ, Goldenberg N, Wang P, et al, 2004 Metformin during pregnancy reduces insulin, insulin resistance, insulin secretion, weight, testosterone and development of gestational diabetes: prospective longitudinal assessment of women with polycystic ovary syndrome from preconception throughout pregnancy. Hum Reprod 19: 510-521.<br \/>\n37. Vanky E, Salvesen KA, Heimstad R, et al, 2004 Metformin reduces pregnancy complications without affecting androgen levels in pregnant polycystic ovary syndrome women: results of a randomized study. Hum Reprod 19: 1734-1740.<br \/>\n38. Vanky E, Zahlsen K, Spigset O, Carlsen SM, 2005 Placental passage of metformin in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 83: 1575-1578.<br \/>\n39. Harborne LR, Sattar N, Norman JE, Fleming R, 2005 Metformin and weight loss in obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome: comparison of doses. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90: 4593-4598.<br \/>\n40. Muth S, Norman J, Sattar N, Fleming R, 2004 Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) often undergo protracted treatment with metformin and are disinclined to stop: indications for a change in licensing arrangements? Hum Reprod 19: 2718-2720.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Richard Fleming<\/p>\n<div class=\"article-pdf\" style=\"text-align: right;\"><a class=\"pdf-download\" href=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/pdf\/The%20use%20of%20insulin%20sensitising%20agents.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Download PDF<\/a><\/div>\n<p>Insulin resistance is an important &#8220;upstream&#8221; driver for reproductive and metabolic abnormalities in women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS). This theoretical background is now supported by substantial evidence for treating women with PCOS with insulin sensitising agents such as metformin or the thiazolidinediones&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[37,2,7],"tags":[560,561,562,563,235],"class_list":["post-1151","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-volume-5-issue-3","category-journal-articles","category-volume-5","tag-insulin-sensitising-agents","tag-insulin-sensitivity","tag-metformin","tag-ovulation","tag-pcos"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/peaceful-mccarthy.213-158-90-25.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1151","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/peaceful-mccarthy.213-158-90-25.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/peaceful-mccarthy.213-158-90-25.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peaceful-mccarthy.213-158-90-25.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peaceful-mccarthy.213-158-90-25.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1151"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/peaceful-mccarthy.213-158-90-25.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1151\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12999,"href":"https:\/\/peaceful-mccarthy.213-158-90-25.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1151\/revisions\/12999"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/peaceful-mccarthy.213-158-90-25.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1151"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peaceful-mccarthy.213-158-90-25.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1151"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peaceful-mccarthy.213-158-90-25.plesk.page\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1151"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}